Lumbee vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,796,105 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.336. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 9.9 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $96,866, a difference of 60.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($65,113 compared to $103,682, a difference of 59.2%), and median household income ($54,644 compared to $86,084, a difference of 57.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $38,802, a difference of 19.4%), median earnings ($36,876 compared to $46,865, a difference of 27.1%), and median male earnings ($41,715 compared to $55,965, a difference of 34.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 155.8%), family poverty (17.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 146.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (31.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 142.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 49.8%), single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 52.3%), and single female poverty (33.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 58.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 91.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 87.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 61.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 49.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 22.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.3% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 66.5%), births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 64.3%), and currently married (39.8% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 60.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 3.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 70.2%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 68.8%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 65.3%), ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 61.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (17.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 11.3%).