Hawaiian vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 318,342,283 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.155. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 11.7 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 16.4%), per capita income ($39,403 compared to $44,480, a difference of 12.9%), and median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $55,965, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $53,127, a difference of 0.090%), median household income ($84,729 compared to $86,084, a difference of 1.6%), and median female earnings ($37,497 compared to $38,802, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 44.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 38.4%), and family poverty (9.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.6%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 33.4%), unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 30.8%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 20.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.7%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.08, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.61%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (28.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 1.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 60.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.7%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.6%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.71%), disability (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.3%).