Burmese vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Costa Rican
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Costa Ricans

Exceptional
Average
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,399
SOCIAL INDEX
51.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
177th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Costa Rican Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,465,012 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.430. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 4.7 Costa Ricans.
Burmese Integration in Costa Rican Communities

Burmese vs Costa Rican Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $54,279, a difference of 20.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $95,565, a difference of 19.0%), and median family income ($123,369 compared to $103,989, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $53,106, a difference of 3.2%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $39,622, a difference of 13.4%).
Burmese vs Costa Rican Income
Income MetricBurmeseCosta Rican
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Good
$44,090
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Good
$103,989
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Excellent
$87,262
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Average
$46,645
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Average
$54,279
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Average
$39,622
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Exceptional
$53,106
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Good
$95,565
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Good
$102,779
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Good
$61,638
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Good
25.3%

Burmese vs Costa Rican Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 34.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 27.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.57%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and single male poverty (11.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.2%).
Burmese vs Costa Rican Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseCosta Rican
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Good
12.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Average
9.0%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Good
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Exceptional
18.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Good
16.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Good
16.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Good
16.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Good
16.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Average
12.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Average
29.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Poor
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Average
11.6%

Burmese vs Costa Rican Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.6%).
Burmese vs Costa Rican Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseCosta Rican
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Good
17.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Poor
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Good
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.5%

Burmese vs Costa Rican Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.70%).
Burmese vs Costa Rican Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseCosta Rican
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Fair
36.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Fair
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Average
82.8%

Burmese vs Costa Rican Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 24.0%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.28%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.2%).
Burmese vs Costa Rican Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseCosta Rican
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Average
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Fair
32.7%

Burmese vs Costa Rican Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.47%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.11%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.47%).
Burmese vs Costa Rican Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseCosta Rican
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
90.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
56.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
6.8%

Burmese vs Costa Rican Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 42.6%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.4%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
Burmese vs Costa Rican Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseCosta Rican
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Poor
97.8%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Tragic
97.1%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Tragic
95.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
95.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
91.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Tragic
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Poor
64.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Fair
58.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Fair
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Average
37.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Average
15.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Average
1.8%

Burmese vs Costa Rican Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 24.9%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.7%).
Burmese vs Costa Rican Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseCosta Rican
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Good
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Excellent
22.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Excellent
46.9%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Excellent
2.4%