Latvian vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,485,780 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.199% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 198.9 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $44,090, a difference of 19.4%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $54,279, a difference of 17.0%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $103,989, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $53,106, a difference of 0.61%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $61,638, a difference of 9.2%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 32.0%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 27.3%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.0%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.9%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.1%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 17.9%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.5%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.23%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.8%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 39.7%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.71%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.72%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.9%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.070%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.71%).