New Zealander vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

COMPARE

New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Costa Rican
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

New Zealanders

Costa Ricans

Excellent
Average
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,399
SOCIAL INDEX
51.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
177th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Costa Rican Integration in New Zealander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,583,257 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.138% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 137.8 Costa Ricans.
New Zealander Integration in Costa Rican Communities

New Zealander vs Costa Rican Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $44,090, a difference of 14.7%), median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $54,279, a difference of 12.8%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $103,989, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $53,106, a difference of 0.36%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $39,622, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,286 compared to $102,779, a difference of 8.3%).
New Zealander vs Costa Rican Income
Income MetricNew ZealanderCosta Rican
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,575
Good
$44,090
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,230
Good
$103,989
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,146
Excellent
$87,262
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,246
Average
$46,645
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,199
Average
$54,279
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,446
Average
$39,622
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,294
Exceptional
$53,106
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,085
Good
$95,565
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,286
Good
$102,779
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,333
Good
$61,638
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Good
25.3%

New Zealander vs Costa Rican Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 17.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 0.16%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
New Zealander vs Costa Rican Poverty
Poverty MetricNew ZealanderCosta Rican
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Good
12.2%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Average
9.0%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Good
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Good
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
18.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.6%
Good
16.9%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.3%
Good
16.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Good
16.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.6%
Good
16.2%
Single Males
Poor
13.2%
Average
12.8%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Average
29.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Poor
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Average
11.6%

New Zealander vs Costa Rican Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 11.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
New Zealander vs Costa Rican Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNew ZealanderCosta Rican
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Good
17.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Poor
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Good
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Average
5.5%

New Zealander vs Costa Rican Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.17%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.030%).
New Zealander vs Costa Rican Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNew ZealanderCosta Rican
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Fair
36.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Fair
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Average
82.8%

New Zealander vs Costa Rican Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.8%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.060%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
New Zealander vs Costa Rican Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNew ZealanderCosta Rican
Family Households
Tragic
62.9%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Average
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Fair
32.7%

New Zealander vs Costa Rican Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 6.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.92%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 0.47%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.92%).
New Zealander vs Costa Rican Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNew ZealanderCosta Rican
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Exceptional
90.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Exceptional
56.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.8%

New Zealander vs Costa Rican Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.5%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 33.2%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.62%).
New Zealander vs Costa Rican Education Level
Education Level MetricNew ZealanderCosta Rican
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
91.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.2%
Poor
64.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Fair
58.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.8%
Fair
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Average
37.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.3%
Average
15.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.0%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.5%
Average
1.8%

New Zealander vs Costa Rican Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 17.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.1%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.050%), disability (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
New Zealander vs Costa Rican Disability
Disability MetricNew ZealanderCosta Rican
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Average
11.2%
Good
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
22.9%
Excellent
22.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Excellent
46.9%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Fair
17.4%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Excellent
2.4%