Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,914,626 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.388. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.109% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 109.3 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $44,090, a difference of 7.5%), median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $54,279, a difference of 5.7%), and median earnings ($48,913 compared to $46,645, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 0.18%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $102,779, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $53,106, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.4%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.90%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother poverty (28.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 7.8%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.32%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.37%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.3%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.1%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 16.4%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.62%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.79%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.80%).