Immigrants from Indonesia vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,525,793 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Immigrant from Indonesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.155. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Indonesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Indonesia corresponds to an increase of 22.3 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,627 compared to $95,565, a difference of 12.6%), median male earnings ($60,935 compared to $54,279, a difference of 12.3%), and median household income ($97,297 compared to $87,262, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($55,521 compared to $53,106, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,694 compared to $61,638, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 18.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 17.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.28%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.80%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 18.0%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and divorced or separated (10.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.070%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.37%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 6.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.64%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.1%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.6%), and master's degree (17.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.0%), 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and 6th grade (96.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 25.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.31%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (47.8% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.0%).