Immigrants from Singapore vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,711,388 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Immigrant from Singapore communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.687. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Singapore within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.137% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Singapore corresponds to an increase of 137.2 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($58,353 compared to $44,090, a difference of 32.4%), median male earnings ($71,348 compared to $54,279, a difference of 31.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($124,429 compared to $95,565, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,835 compared to $53,106, a difference of 7.0%), wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($72,963 compared to $61,638, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 39.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (12.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 30.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.7%), male poverty (10.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.93%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 31.1%), births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 27.6%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.1%), married-couple households (48.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and currently married (47.8% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 35.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.2% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 99.3%), professional degree (7.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 73.2%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 56.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 30.7%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age over 75 (45.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.3%).