Immigrants from Australia vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,363,885 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.225. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 36.5 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $44,090, a difference of 31.4%), median male earnings ($67,634 compared to $54,279, a difference of 24.6%), and median family income ($126,620 compared to $103,989, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $53,106, a difference of 6.7%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $61,638, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 26.8%), family poverty (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.86%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 27.7%), births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 22.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.4%), currently married (47.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.26, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 45.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 54.4%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 51.6%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 20.8%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.45%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.0%).