Immigrants from Philippines vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 241,310,560 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Immigrant from Philippines communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.258. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Philippines corresponds to a decrease of 2.4 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($57,930 compared to $53,106, a difference of 9.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,910 compared to $95,565, a difference of 7.7%), and median household income ($93,899 compared to $87,262, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($44,000 compared to $44,090, a difference of 0.20%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and median male earnings ($55,809 compared to $54,279, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 17.4%), single father poverty (14.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.18%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 7.4%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 25.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 15.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.1%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.6%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (58.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 20.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.30%), disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.71%).