Russian vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,096,718 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.104% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 104.5 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,154 compared to $44,090, a difference of 20.6%), median male earnings ($63,939 compared to $54,279, a difference of 17.8%), and median family income ($120,487 compared to $103,989, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $53,106, a difference of 2.4%), householder income over 65 years ($67,626 compared to $61,638, a difference of 9.7%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 20.9%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 20.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.1%), and births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.1%), family households (63.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.26, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 41.6%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 38.1%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.58%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.18%), female disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.58%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.60%).