Immigrants from El Salvador vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,547,041 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Immigrant from El Salvador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.056. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from El Salvador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from El Salvador corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,394 compared to $44,090, a difference of 14.8%), median male earnings ($47,973 compared to $54,279, a difference of 13.2%), and median family income ($92,545 compared to $103,989, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,599 compared to $53,106, a difference of 2.8%), householder income over 65 years ($58,226 compared to $61,638, a difference of 5.9%), and median household income ($81,213 compared to $87,262, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 23.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.3%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.5%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.4% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.4%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 76.1%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.6%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 28.9%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.41%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.2%).