Alaska Native vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,356,429 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to an increase of 6.9 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,558 compared to $44,090, a difference of 11.5%), median household income ($79,509 compared to $87,262, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,991 compared to $102,779, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $61,638, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $53,106, a difference of 1.7%), and wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 34.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 26.9%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 61.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 55.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (10.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 16.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.87%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 49.2%), births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 17.1%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (45.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 82.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 49.4%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 29.1%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.52%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.95%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 109.7%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 53.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.31%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.6%).