Hmong vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,005,220 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.092. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.052% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 51.7 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $102,779, a difference of 16.6%), per capita income ($38,120 compared to $44,090, a difference of 15.7%), and median household income ($75,839 compared to $87,262, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $53,106, a difference of 7.6%), householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $61,638, a difference of 9.4%), and wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (23.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 11.5%), single male poverty (14.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.2%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 51.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.8%), male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 17.9%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.49%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.79%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 8.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.4%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.6%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.7%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 24.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.92%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.2%).