Immigrants from Lithuania vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,002,733 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.279. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.164% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 163.6 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($63,346 compared to $54,279, a difference of 16.7%), per capita income ($51,361 compared to $44,090, a difference of 16.5%), and median family income ($118,053 compared to $103,989, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $53,106, a difference of 3.6%), householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $61,638, a difference of 7.2%), and median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $39,622, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 25.6%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 24.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 6.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and single male poverty (11.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.5%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.8%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.6% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.0%), family households (63.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.33%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.3%), professional degree (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 24.7%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.5%).