Immigrants from Nepal vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,071,569 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Immigrant from Nepal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.294. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nepal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nepal corresponds to a decrease of 14.7 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in median earnings ($47,925 compared to $46,645, a difference of 2.7%), median female earnings ($40,704 compared to $39,622, a difference of 2.7%), and median male earnings ($55,615 compared to $54,279, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($44,187 compared to $44,090, a difference of 0.22%), median household income ($87,046 compared to $87,262, a difference of 0.25%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,322 compared to $95,565, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 12.4%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.0%), and receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.090%), poverty (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.0% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 10.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and family households (62.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.16%), currently married (46.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.85%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 22.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 16.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.8%), master's degree (17.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and bachelor's degree (41.7% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 34.3%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 0.040%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.61%).