Luxembourger vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,757,519 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 39.7 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 8.5%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $53,106, a difference of 5.4%), and median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $54,279, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $39,622, a difference of 0.68%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $102,779, a difference of 0.74%), and median household income ($86,418 compared to $87,262, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 32.7%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 27.1%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.3%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.2%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 24.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.0%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.8%), family households (63.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.26, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 77.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.7%), associate's degree (48.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and college, under 1 year (68.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.6%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.33%), male disability (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.4%).