Turkish vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,035,424 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.068. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 3.6 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $52,783, a difference of 2.8%), median household income ($99,389 compared to $97,311, a difference of 2.1%), and median earnings ($53,919 compared to $53,001, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($52,391 compared to $52,649, a difference of 0.49%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.63%), and median family income ($121,202 compared to $120,301, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 10.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and family poverty (7.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.11%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.92%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.7%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.090%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households (63.6% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 19.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 15.9%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and college, under 1 year (70.7% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (53.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 0.070%), bachelor's degree (46.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.0%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 0.94%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.7%).