Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Latvian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from South Central Asia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from South Central Asia

Latvians

Exceptional
Exceptional
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Latvian Integration in Immigrants from South Central Asia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,863,992 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.058. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Latvians.
Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Latvian Communities

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Latvian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $52,783, a difference of 9.5%), median household income ($106,057 compared to $97,311, a difference of 9.0%), and median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $63,498, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($52,660 compared to $52,649, a difference of 0.020%), householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $67,326, a difference of 4.1%), and median family income ($125,956 compared to $120,301, a difference of 4.7%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Latvian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaLatvian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,660
Exceptional
$52,649
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$125,956
Exceptional
$120,301
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$106,057
Exceptional
$97,311
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$57,114
Exceptional
$53,001
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$68,960
Exceptional
$63,498
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,324
Exceptional
$43,941
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,818
Excellent
$52,783
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$116,626
Exceptional
$108,926
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$124,188
Exceptional
$115,957
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$70,103
Exceptional
$67,326
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.3%
Tragic
27.9%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Latvian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 16.0%), single father poverty (14.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and female poverty (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Latvian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaLatvian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.6%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
13.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
13.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.8%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.5%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.3%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
9.1%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Latvian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.2%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Latvian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaLatvian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Latvian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.49%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Latvian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaLatvian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.0%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Exceptional
83.8%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Latvian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (30.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 13.6%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and divorced or separated (10.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.1%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and currently married (50.0% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 3.2%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Latvian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaLatvian
Family Households
Exceptional
66.4%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.0%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
50.6%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.0%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
24.7%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Latvian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 14.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.61%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.060%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.61%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaLatvian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.5%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Fair
6.1%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Latvian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.3%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and bachelor's degree (48.3% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.51%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Latvian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaLatvian
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Good
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Good
97.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Exceptional
89.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
72.1%
Exceptional
71.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
66.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.7%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.3%
Exceptional
46.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.7%
Exceptional
19.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.6%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Latvian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 27.6%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 24.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 3.0%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Latvian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaLatvian
Disability
Exceptional
9.9%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.9%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.0%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%