Immigrants from Central America vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,456,672 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.579. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,974 compared to $52,649, a difference of 50.5%), median family income ($85,050 compared to $120,301, a difference of 41.4%), and median male earnings ($45,538 compared to $63,498, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $52,783, a difference of 3.5%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $67,326, a difference of 26.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 90.6%), family poverty (12.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 71.0%), and receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 33.7%), female unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 33.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 52.4%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 49.6%), and births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.2%), married-couple households (45.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and family households (68.3% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 38.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 21.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.89%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 134.4%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 117.6%), and doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 117.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.2%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 25.5%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.1%), disability (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.2%).