Brazilian vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,331,275 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to a decrease of 1.7 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,700 compared to $52,649, a difference of 12.7%), median family income ($106,942 compared to $120,301, a difference of 12.5%), and median male earnings ($56,837 compared to $63,498, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $52,783, a difference of 2.9%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $43,941, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 28.9%), receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 21.5%), and family poverty (8.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 4.6%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and single female poverty (20.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.0%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.94%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple households (46.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.37%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.7%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.2%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.52%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.23%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.73%).