Peruvian vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 187,646,215 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Peruvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Peruvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Peruvians corresponds to an increase of 8.3 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,479 compared to $52,649, a difference of 18.4%), median family income ($105,444 compared to $120,301, a difference of 14.1%), and median male earnings ($55,659 compared to $63,498, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,052 compared to $52,783, a difference of 6.2%), householder income over 65 years ($62,766 compared to $67,326, a difference of 7.3%), and median household income ($90,261 compared to $97,311, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 35.8%), receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.8%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.0%), single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.7%), and births to unmarried women (31.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.53%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 14.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 43.5%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.90%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.20%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.6%).