Immigrants from Oceania vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,799,992 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.522. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.143% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 143.3 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $52,649, a difference of 16.4%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $63,498, a difference of 14.0%), and median family income ($106,453 compared to $120,301, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $52,783, a difference of 1.7%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $67,326, a difference of 4.5%), and wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 28.8%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 24.8%), and family poverty (8.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.4%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.6%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.1%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (64.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.020%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 45.5%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 36.7%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.72%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.82%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.5%).