Laotian vs Latvian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Laotian
Latvian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Laotians
Latvians
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Latvian Integration in Laotian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,674,006 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.835. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.257% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 257.0 Latvians.
Laotian vs Latvian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,041 compared to $52,649, a difference of 11.9%), median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $63,498, a difference of 7.0%), and median family income ($112,859 compared to $120,301, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $67,326, a difference of 1.5%), median household income ($94,990 compared to $97,311, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $52,783, a difference of 3.0%).
Income Metric | Laotian | Latvian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,041 | Exceptional $52,649 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,859 | Exceptional $120,301 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $94,990 | Exceptional $97,311 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,343 | Exceptional $53,001 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $59,351 | Exceptional $63,498 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,133 | Exceptional $43,941 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,369 | Excellent $52,783 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,993 | Exceptional $108,926 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,051 | Exceptional $115,957 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,306 | Exceptional $67,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.4% | Tragic 27.9% |
Laotian vs Latvian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 20.9%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.27%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Poverty Metric | Laotian | Latvian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.2% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.0% | Exceptional 26.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Laotian vs Latvian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.6%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Laotian | Latvian |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Laotian vs Latvian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Laotian | Latvian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.8% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.6% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.9% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Laotian vs Latvian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.2%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.3%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.0%), currently married (47.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Laotian | Latvian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.8% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.26 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.5% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Laotian vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.79%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Laotian | Latvian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.1% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.6% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Fair 6.1% |
Laotian vs Latvian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.1%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.1%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.72%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.73%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.73%).
Education Level Metric | Laotian | Latvian |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Average 92.6% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.5% | Exceptional 89.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.5% | Exceptional 71.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.8% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.9% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.0% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.0% | Exceptional 19.8% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Laotian vs Latvian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.58%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.7%).
Disability Metric | Laotian | Latvian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Poor 47.9% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |