Cape Verdean vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,484,110 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Cape Verdean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cape Verdeans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cape Verdeans corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($50,077 compared to $67,326, a difference of 34.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,580 compared to $115,957, a difference of 32.4%), and per capita income ($39,935 compared to $52,649, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $52,783, a difference of 2.7%), median female earnings ($38,614 compared to $43,941, a difference of 13.8%), and wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 131.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 55.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.18%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 56.9%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 46.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.5% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 67.5%), births to unmarried women (41.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 49.0%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.8% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 59.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 39.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (46.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 28.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 101.0%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 85.8%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 78.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 39.0%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.7%).