Guamanian/Chamorro vs Latvian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Guamanian/Chamorro
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Guamanians/Chamorros

Latvians

Fair
Exceptional
4,082
SOCIAL INDEX
38.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
205th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Latvian Integration in Guamanian/Chamorro Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,775,746 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.641. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to an increase of 20.7 Latvians.
Guamanian/Chamorro Integration in Latvian Communities

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Latvian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,678 compared to $52,649, a difference of 26.3%), median family income ($101,061 compared to $120,301, a difference of 19.0%), and median male earnings ($53,661 compared to $63,498, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,423 compared to $52,783, a difference of 1.2%), householder income over 65 years ($63,187 compared to $67,326, a difference of 6.6%), and wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Latvian Income
Income MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLatvian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,678
Exceptional
$52,649
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,061
Exceptional
$120,301
Median Household Income
Good
$86,255
Exceptional
$97,311
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,933
Exceptional
$53,001
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,661
Exceptional
$63,498
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,717
Exceptional
$43,941
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,423
Excellent
$52,783
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,569
Exceptional
$108,926
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,170
Exceptional
$115,957
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,187
Exceptional
$67,326
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.0%
Tragic
27.9%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Latvian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 26.6%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.4%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.4%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Latvian Poverty
Poverty MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLatvian
Poverty
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Good
13.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.6%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.5%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
13.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
13.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.4%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.7%
Exceptional
9.1%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Latvian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.4%), female unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.5%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Latvian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLatvian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.0%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Latvian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Latvian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLatvian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.2%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.7%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.4%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
83.8%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Latvian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.6%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.8%), and births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.37%), currently married (47.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.8%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Latvian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLatvian
Family Households
Exceptional
66.6%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.7%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.1%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.6%
Exceptional
27.7%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Latvian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 31.7%), no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 20.4%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLatvian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.5%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.2%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Fair
6.1%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Latvian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 64.3%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 59.9%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.65%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Latvian Education Level
Education Level MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLatvian
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Fair
97.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Fair
94.8%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Exceptional
89.2%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.4%
Exceptional
71.6%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.6%
Exceptional
66.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.8%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
46.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
19.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.6%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Latvian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 20.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 19.1%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and female disability (12.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.1%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Latvian Disability
Disability MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLatvian
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.4%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%