Shoshone vs Latvian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Shoshone
Latvian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Shoshone
Latvians
2,256
SOCIAL INDEX
20.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
264th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Latvian Integration in Shoshone Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,787,243 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Shoshone communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Shoshone within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.080% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Shoshone corresponds to an increase of 79.5 Latvians.
Shoshone vs Latvian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,072 compared to $52,649, a difference of 42.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,588 compared to $115,957, a difference of 38.7%), and median family income ($87,872 compared to $120,301, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,720 compared to $52,783, a difference of 8.3%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,681 compared to $67,326, a difference of 25.4%).
Income Metric | Shoshone | Latvian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,072 | Exceptional $52,649 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $87,872 | Exceptional $120,301 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,660 | Exceptional $97,311 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,932 | Exceptional $53,001 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,930 | Exceptional $63,498 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,677 | Exceptional $43,941 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $48,720 | Excellent $52,783 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,062 | Exceptional $108,926 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,588 | Exceptional $115,957 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,681 | Exceptional $67,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.4% | Tragic 27.9% |
Shoshone vs Latvian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 56.5%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 54.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 15.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 20.9%), and single mother poverty (32.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 22.4%).
Poverty Metric | Shoshone | Latvian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.9% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.5% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.0% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.7% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.1% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 22.9% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.9% | Exceptional 26.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Poor 12.4% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Shoshone vs Latvian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 94.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (7.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 59.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 58.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 15.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Shoshone | Latvian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Shoshone vs Latvian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Shoshone | Latvian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.8% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.3% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.4% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.2% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.3% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Shoshone vs Latvian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.7%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 28.6%), and births to unmarried women (35.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 0.30%), family households (63.8% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.11, a difference of 8.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Shoshone | Latvian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.8% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.5% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.9% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.37 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.0% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 35.3% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Shoshone vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 44.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 29.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.92%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 10.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Shoshone | Latvian |
No Vehicles Available | Fair 10.8% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Fair 89.5% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.9% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 24.9% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Fair 6.1% |
Shoshone vs Latvian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 88.7%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 86.2%), and master's degree (11.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 78.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%).
Education Level Metric | Shoshone | Latvian |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Average 92.5% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 89.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.1% | Exceptional 71.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.3% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.4% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.3% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 19.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Shoshone vs Latvian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 42.2%), vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.8%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age over 75 (49.9% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 10.5%).
Disability Metric | Shoshone | Latvian |
Disability | Tragic 13.5% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Average 5.6% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.9% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.3% |