Choctaw vs Latvian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Choctaw
Latvian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Choctaw
Latvians
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Latvian Integration in Choctaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,408,871 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.646. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 29.0 Latvians.
Choctaw vs Latvian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $52,649, a difference of 46.3%), median family income ($84,835 compared to $120,301, a difference of 41.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $115,957, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.96%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $52,783, a difference of 16.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $67,326, a difference of 26.9%).
Income Metric | Choctaw | Latvian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,999 | Exceptional $52,649 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,835 | Exceptional $120,301 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $69,947 | Exceptional $97,311 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,270 | Exceptional $53,001 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,729 | Exceptional $63,498 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,775 | Exceptional $43,941 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,450 | Excellent $52,783 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $78,168 | Exceptional $108,926 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,287 | Exceptional $115,957 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,060 | Exceptional $67,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Tragic 27.9% |
Choctaw vs Latvian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 64.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 62.0%), and married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 61.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 15.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 24.6%).
Poverty Metric | Choctaw | Latvian |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.3% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.5% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 17.0% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 20.7% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.4% | Exceptional 26.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Choctaw vs Latvian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 44.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 28.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Choctaw | Latvian |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Choctaw vs Latvian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Choctaw | Latvian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.5% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.4% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.0% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.4% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.5% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.2% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Choctaw vs Latvian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.3%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.4%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.11, a difference of 3.5%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Choctaw | Latvian |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.3% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.9% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Choctaw vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.4%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Choctaw | Latvian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.2% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.3% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Fair 6.1% |
Choctaw vs Latvian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 93.4%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 79.6%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 78.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.25%).
Education Level Metric | Choctaw | Latvian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.8% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.8% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Exceptional 89.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Exceptional 71.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.3% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.8% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.4% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 19.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Choctaw vs Latvian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 66.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 61.3%), and ambulatory disability (8.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 10.8%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 16.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.0%).
Disability Metric | Choctaw | Latvian |
Disability | Tragic 15.4% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 15.4% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.7% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.3% |