Fijian vs Latvian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Fijian
Latvian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Fijians
Latvians
3,167
SOCIAL INDEX
29.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
230th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Latvian Integration in Fijian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,907,739 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 0.7 Latvians.
Fijian vs Latvian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,690 compared to $52,649, a difference of 43.5%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $63,498, a difference of 39.2%), and median family income ($87,387 compared to $120,301, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $52,783, a difference of 5.3%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $67,326, a difference of 18.6%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 21.7%).
Income Metric | Fijian | Latvian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,690 | Exceptional $52,649 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $87,387 | Exceptional $120,301 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,205 | Exceptional $97,311 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,193 | Exceptional $53,001 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $45,607 | Exceptional $63,498 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,114 | Exceptional $43,941 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,132 | Excellent $52,783 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $79,956 | Exceptional $108,926 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $85,187 | Exceptional $115,957 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,768 | Exceptional $67,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.9% | Tragic 27.9% |
Fijian vs Latvian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 48.1%), family poverty (10.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 43.1%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 42.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.7%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 8.9%).
Poverty Metric | Fijian | Latvian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.0% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 26.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Fijian vs Latvian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 36.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 29.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.63%).
Unemployment Metric | Fijian | Latvian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 3.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Fijian vs Latvian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Fijian | Latvian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.4% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.4% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.4% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.2% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Fijian vs Latvian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 49.7%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.1%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.0%), currently married (46.3% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and family households (65.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 5.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Fijian | Latvian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.0% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.1% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.36 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.3% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.3% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Fijian vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.22%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Fijian | Latvian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.5% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.5% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.6% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Fair 6.1% |
Fijian vs Latvian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 128.3%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 113.4%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 92.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.98%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.98%).
Education Level Metric | Fijian | Latvian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.7% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.5% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.0% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.2% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.0% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 89.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 57.7% | Exceptional 71.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.3% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.4% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.7% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.3% | Exceptional 19.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.1% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Fijian vs Latvian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 27.2%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.3%).
Disability Metric | Fijian | Latvian |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.7% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.3% |