Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Latvian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Latvian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Latvians
6,462
SOCIAL INDEX
62.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
152nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Latvian Integration in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,348,153 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.063. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Latvians.
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Latvian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,539 compared to $52,649, a difference of 20.9%), median male earnings ($55,241 compared to $63,498, a difference of 14.9%), and median family income ($106,252 compared to $120,301, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,089 compared to $67,326, a difference of 5.1%), householder income under 25 years ($55,714 compared to $52,783, a difference of 5.6%), and median household income ($91,541 compared to $97,311, a difference of 6.3%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Latvian |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,539 | Exceptional $52,649 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,252 | Exceptional $120,301 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $91,541 | Exceptional $97,311 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,671 | Exceptional $53,001 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,241 | Exceptional $63,498 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,558 | Exceptional $43,941 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,714 | Excellent $52,783 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $100,283 | Exceptional $108,926 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,109 | Exceptional $115,957 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,089 | Exceptional $67,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.8% | Tragic 27.9% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Latvian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 30.5%), receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 21.5%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.86%), single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.8%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Latvian |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Excellent 10.6% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Excellent 12.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.8% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.2% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.4% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.1% | Exceptional 26.9% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.2% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.1% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Latvian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.6%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Latvian |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.1% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.5% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Latvian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Latvian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.9% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.8% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.1% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.8% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Latvian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.1%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.1%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 3.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Latvian |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.5% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.1% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.36 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.4% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 34.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 13.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Latvian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.6% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.1% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Fair 6.1% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Latvian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 87.8%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 54.8%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Latvian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.3% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.1% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.6% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.2% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.1% | Exceptional 89.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Fair 64.5% | Exceptional 71.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.5% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.2% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 36.8% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Exceptional 19.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 4.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Poor 1.7% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Latvian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.15%), disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Latvian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.3% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Good 3.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |