Korean vs Latvian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Korean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Koreans

Latvians

Good
Exceptional
6,713
SOCIAL INDEX
64.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
147th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Latvian Integration in Korean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,961,359 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Korean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Koreans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Koreans corresponds to an increase of 4.7 Latvians.
Korean Integration in Latvian Communities

Korean vs Latvian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Korean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,522 compared to $52,649, a difference of 18.2%), median male earnings ($56,672 compared to $63,498, a difference of 12.0%), and wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($67,472 compared to $67,326, a difference of 0.22%), median household income ($95,018 compared to $97,311, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,824 compared to $108,926, a difference of 4.9%).
Korean vs Latvian Income
Income MetricKoreanLatvian
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,522
Exceptional
$52,649
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,103
Exceptional
$120,301
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,018
Exceptional
$97,311
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,727
Exceptional
$53,001
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,672
Exceptional
$63,498
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,276
Exceptional
$43,941
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,730
Excellent
$52,783
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$103,824
Exceptional
$108,926
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$110,334
Exceptional
$115,957
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,472
Exceptional
$67,326
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.4%
Tragic
27.9%

Korean vs Latvian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Korean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 18.0%), single father poverty (14.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 17.8%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.69%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother poverty (26.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Korean vs Latvian Poverty
Poverty MetricKoreanLatvian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.0%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Exceptional
13.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
13.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.0%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.6%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.0%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.4%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.1%

Korean vs Latvian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Korean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.4%).
Korean vs Latvian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricKoreanLatvian
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.5%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.5%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%

Korean vs Latvian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Korean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.7% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.93%).
Korean vs Latvian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricKoreanLatvian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.7%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.4%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.3%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Exceptional
83.8%

Korean vs Latvian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Korean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.0%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and family households with children (29.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (49.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.8%).
Korean vs Latvian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricKoreanLatvian
Family Households
Exceptional
68.3%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.2%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.7%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.36
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.1%
Exceptional
27.7%

Korean vs Latvian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Korean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 41.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 24.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.5%).
Korean vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricKoreanLatvian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.0%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
24.1%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Fair
6.1%

Korean vs Latvian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Korean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.2%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 53.5%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.87%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.88%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.89%).
Korean vs Latvian Education Level
Education Level MetricKoreanLatvian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Poor
92.1%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.8%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.6%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.6%
Exceptional
89.2%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Exceptional
71.6%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.7%
Exceptional
66.1%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Exceptional
46.1%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Exceptional
19.8%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.6%

Korean vs Latvian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Korean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.7%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.58%), disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.67%).
Korean vs Latvian Disability
Disability MetricKoreanLatvian
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Good
11.0%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.1%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.6%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Fair
3.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%