Marshallese vs Latvian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Marshallese
Latvian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Marshallese
Latvians
2,873
SOCIAL INDEX
26.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
240th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Latvian Integration in Marshallese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 10,779,154 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Marshallese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.897. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Marshallese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Marshallese corresponds to an increase of 12.2 Latvians.
Marshallese vs Latvian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,108 compared to $52,649, a difference of 34.6%), median male earnings ($48,137 compared to $63,498, a difference of 31.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,575 compared to $108,926, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,874 compared to $67,326, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,627 compared to $52,783, a difference of 4.3%), and wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 19.0%).
Income Metric | Marshallese | Latvian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,108 | Exceptional $52,649 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,293 | Exceptional $120,301 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $78,930 | Exceptional $97,311 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,969 | Exceptional $53,001 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,137 | Exceptional $63,498 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,459 | Exceptional $43,941 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,627 | Excellent $52,783 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,575 | Exceptional $108,926 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,455 | Exceptional $115,957 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,874 | Exceptional $67,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.4% | Tragic 27.9% |
Marshallese vs Latvian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 54.5%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 40.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.84%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 7.4%).
Poverty Metric | Marshallese | Latvian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.9% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.3% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.9% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.1% | Exceptional 26.9% |
Married Couples | Average 5.2% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Marshallese vs Latvian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 45.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 41.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Marshallese | Latvian |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 3.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Marshallese vs Latvian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Marshallese | Latvian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.2% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.3% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.5% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.3% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.2% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.4% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.3% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Marshallese vs Latvian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 25.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.3%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 0.75%), family households (63.7% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Marshallese | Latvian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.7% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.2% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.38 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.5% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Marshallese vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 33.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.090%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Marshallese | Latvian |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.9% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.3% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.1% | Fair 6.1% |
Marshallese vs Latvian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 76.6%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 71.3%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 66.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.45%).
Education Level Metric | Marshallese | Latvian |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 2.0% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Excellent 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Good 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Good 97.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Good 97.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Average 95.7% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.7% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Exceptional 89.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.9% | Exceptional 71.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.6% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.7% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 19.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Marshallese vs Latvian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 40.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 23.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.5%).
Disability Metric | Marshallese | Latvian |
Disability | Tragic 13.1% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.9% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.94% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.7% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.1% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |