Houma vs Latvian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Houma
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Houma

Latvians

Tragic
Exceptional
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Latvian Integration in Houma Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,828,791 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.659% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 659.3 Latvians.
Houma Integration in Latvian Communities

Houma vs Latvian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $115,957, a difference of 60.8%), per capita income ($32,996 compared to $52,649, a difference of 59.6%), and median family income ($76,188 compared to $120,301, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $52,783, a difference of 19.0%), median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $63,498, a difference of 25.6%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $53,001, a difference of 36.1%).
Houma vs Latvian Income
Income MetricHoumaLatvian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$32,996
Exceptional
$52,649
Median Family Income
Tragic
$76,188
Exceptional
$120,301
Median Household Income
Tragic
$62,575
Exceptional
$97,311
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,949
Exceptional
$53,001
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,547
Exceptional
$63,498
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$30,343
Exceptional
$43,941
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,356
Excellent
$52,783
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,044
Exceptional
$108,926
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$72,093
Exceptional
$115,957
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$44,822
Exceptional
$67,326
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
38.7%
Tragic
27.9%

Houma vs Latvian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (14.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 106.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 96.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 92.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 34.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 50.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 55.7%).
Houma vs Latvian Poverty
Poverty MetricHoumaLatvian
Poverty
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
20.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
26.2%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
24.9%
Exceptional
13.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
26.2%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
13.5%
Single Males
Tragic
23.5%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Tragic
33.8%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
26.7%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
9.1%

Houma vs Latvian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 87.4%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 46.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.3%).
Houma vs Latvian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHoumaLatvian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
4.9%

Houma vs Latvian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 7.4%).
Houma vs Latvian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHoumaLatvian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
59.5%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
72.7%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.6%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.7%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.2%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.9%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.5%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
83.8%

Houma vs Latvian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 67.9%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 50.0%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.4%), family households (65.7% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 6.4%).
Houma vs Latvian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHoumaLatvian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.5%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
46.6%
Exceptional
27.7%

Houma vs Latvian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 20.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 17.1%).
Houma vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHoumaLatvian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.5%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.6%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.4%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.1%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.9%
Fair
6.1%

Houma vs Latvian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 181.7%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 168.9%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 150.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Houma vs Latvian Education Level
Education Level MetricHoumaLatvian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.2%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.0%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
83.7%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.5%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
75.0%
Exceptional
89.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
47.6%
Exceptional
71.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
41.2%
Exceptional
66.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
21.4%
Exceptional
46.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
19.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
0.96%
Exceptional
2.6%

Houma vs Latvian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 83.8%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 73.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 67.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 15.8%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 24.5%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 30.0%).
Houma vs Latvian Disability
Disability MetricHoumaLatvian
Disability
Tragic
17.1%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Tragic
17.4%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.7%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.3%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.2%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.3%