Immigrants from Nigeria vs Latvian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Nigeria
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Nigeria

Latvians

Fair
Exceptional
2,310
SOCIAL INDEX
20.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
263rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Latvian Integration in Immigrants from Nigeria Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,524,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant from Nigeria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nigeria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nigeria corresponds to an increase of 3.0 Latvians.
Immigrants from Nigeria Integration in Latvian Communities

Immigrants from Nigeria vs Latvian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,339 compared to $52,649, a difference of 30.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,589 compared to $108,926, a difference of 25.8%), and median family income ($96,439 compared to $120,301, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,174 compared to $52,783, a difference of 7.3%), median female earnings ($39,294 compared to $43,941, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,942 compared to $67,326, a difference of 14.2%).
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Latvian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from NigeriaLatvian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,339
Exceptional
$52,649
Median Family Income
Tragic
$96,439
Exceptional
$120,301
Median Household Income
Tragic
$81,236
Exceptional
$97,311
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,030
Exceptional
$53,001
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,310
Exceptional
$63,498
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,294
Exceptional
$43,941
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,174
Excellent
$52,783
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,589
Exceptional
$108,926
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,804
Exceptional
$115,957
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$58,942
Exceptional
$67,326
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.7%
Tragic
27.9%

Immigrants from Nigeria vs Latvian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 43.8%), family poverty (10.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 43.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.30%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.6%).
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Latvian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from NigeriaLatvian
Poverty
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
13.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
13.5%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.1%

Immigrants from Nigeria vs Latvian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.9%), unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.9%), and female unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 8.7%).
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Latvian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from NigeriaLatvian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.6%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Nigeria vs Latvian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Latvian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from NigeriaLatvian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.9%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.6%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
83.8%

Immigrants from Nigeria vs Latvian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 48.3%), births to unmarried women (35.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 27.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.6%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.11, a difference of 6.8%).
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Latvian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from NigeriaLatvian
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from Nigeria vs Latvian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 3.1%).
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from NigeriaLatvian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.8%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.2%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.9%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.7%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Fair
6.1%

Immigrants from Nigeria vs Latvian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 63.0%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 52.9%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Latvian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from NigeriaLatvian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.7%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.4%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.9%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.7%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
89.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.7%
Exceptional
71.6%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.9%
Exceptional
66.1%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.6%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.7%
Exceptional
46.1%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.6%
Exceptional
19.8%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Exceptional
2.6%

Immigrants from Nigeria vs Latvian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 24.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.43%), disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.2%).
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Latvian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from NigeriaLatvian
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.5%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%