Armenian vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,372,529 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Armenian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Armenians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Armenians corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Armenian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 12.5%), median family income ($109,692 compared to $120,301, a difference of 9.7%), and median male earnings ($58,134 compared to $63,498, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,179 compared to $52,783, a difference of 0.75%), median female earnings ($42,212 compared to $43,941, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,248 compared to $108,926, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Armenian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 41.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 31.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.29%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and single female poverty (18.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Armenian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 28.4%), unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Armenian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.9% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Armenian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.8%), divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.11, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 0.11%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.99%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Armenian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.3%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.050%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Armenian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 59.4%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.9%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.96%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Armenian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (3.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 48.3%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 27.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.3%), disability (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.1%).