Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,452,820 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to an increase of 29.7 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,464 compared to $52,649, a difference of 21.1%), median male earnings ($53,237 compared to $63,498, a difference of 19.3%), and median family income ($101,354 compared to $120,301, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $52,783, a difference of 0.27%), median female earnings ($39,186 compared to $43,941, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,848 compared to $67,326, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 39.4%), receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 33.6%), and family poverty (9.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.0%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.8%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.64%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.3%), births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 20.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.4%), family households (65.6% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.11, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.1%), no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.60%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 48.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 44.6%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 11.2%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.16%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.59%).