Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,005,098 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.242. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.038% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 38.3 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $108,926, a difference of 11.3%), per capita income ($47,394 compared to $52,649, a difference of 11.1%), and median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $63,498, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $52,783, a difference of 1.7%), householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $67,326, a difference of 5.8%), and median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $43,941, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.69%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.7%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 1.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.94%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.14%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.67%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.9%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.5%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 8.9%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.3%), disability (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.1%).