Immigrants vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,356,244 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.528. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,010 compared to $52,649, a difference of 22.4%), median family income ($100,962 compared to $120,301, a difference of 19.2%), and median male earnings ($54,168 compared to $63,498, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,201 compared to $52,783, a difference of 0.79%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and median female earnings ($39,328 compared to $43,941, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 54.7%), receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 42.5%), and family poverty (10.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.13%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.77%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.6%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.4%), and births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (66.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 19.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.32%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 80.8%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 43.1%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 12.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 11.6%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.3%).