Portuguese vs Latvian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Portuguese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Portuguese

Latvians

Average
Exceptional
4,363
SOCIAL INDEX
41.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
201st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Latvian Integration in Portuguese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,299,536 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.700. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.054% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to an increase of 53.9 Latvians.
Portuguese Integration in Latvian Communities

Portuguese vs Latvian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,362 compared to $52,649, a difference of 18.7%), median family income ($106,286 compared to $120,301, a difference of 13.2%), and median male earnings ($56,663 compared to $63,498, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.9%), householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $52,783, a difference of 3.1%), and median household income ($88,976 compared to $97,311, a difference of 9.4%).
Portuguese vs Latvian Income
Income MetricPortugueseLatvian
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,362
Exceptional
$52,649
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,286
Exceptional
$120,301
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,976
Exceptional
$97,311
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,032
Exceptional
$53,001
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,663
Exceptional
$63,498
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,177
Exceptional
$43,941
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,436
Excellent
$52,783
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,429
Exceptional
$108,926
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$105,309
Exceptional
$115,957
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,440
Exceptional
$67,326
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
27.9%

Portuguese vs Latvian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 33.6%), family poverty (8.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 18.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.6%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and single mother poverty (28.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 7.2%).
Portuguese vs Latvian Poverty
Poverty MetricPortugueseLatvian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Excellent
8.4%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.8%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.6%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.5%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
13.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
13.5%
Single Males
Fair
12.9%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Excellent
20.5%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Good
28.8%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Fair
12.2%
Exceptional
9.1%

Portuguese vs Latvian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 21.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Portuguese vs Latvian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPortugueseLatvian
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.4%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%

Portuguese vs Latvian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Portuguese vs Latvian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPortugueseLatvian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.4%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.0%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.4%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.4%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.3%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Exceptional
83.8%

Portuguese vs Latvian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.3%), births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 22.0%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.23%), currently married (47.3% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.7%).
Portuguese vs Latvian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPortugueseLatvian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.8%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.8%
Exceptional
27.7%

Portuguese vs Latvian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.0%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.2%).
Portuguese vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPortugueseLatvian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.6%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.6%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.8%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Fair
6.1%

Portuguese vs Latvian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 53.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 47.1%), and master's degree (13.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.58%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.58%).
Portuguese vs Latvian Education Level
Education Level MetricPortugueseLatvian
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Poor
93.3%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
92.0%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
85.0%
Exceptional
89.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.4%
Exceptional
71.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
66.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
44.1%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
46.1%
Master's Degree
Poor
13.9%
Exceptional
19.8%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Exceptional
2.6%

Portuguese vs Latvian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 23.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 17.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.8%).
Portuguese vs Latvian Disability
Disability MetricPortugueseLatvian
Disability
Tragic
12.6%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.5%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.6%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%