Hawaiian vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,174,002 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 12.7 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,403 compared to $52,649, a difference of 33.6%), median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $63,498, a difference of 25.8%), and median family income ($98,869 compared to $120,301, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $52,783, a difference of 0.56%), householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $67,326, a difference of 3.7%), and wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 41.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 31.9%), and family poverty (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.47%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.6%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.8%), and births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.11%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 46.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 25.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 81.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 76.2%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 71.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 21.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.98%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 5.7%).