Puerto Rican vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,687,490 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Puerto Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.043. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puerto Ricans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puerto Ricans corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($70,423 compared to $120,301, a difference of 70.8%), per capita income ($31,268 compared to $52,649, a difference of 68.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,234 compared to $115,957, a difference of 67.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($39,726 compared to $52,783, a difference of 32.9%), median female earnings ($31,560 compared to $43,941, a difference of 39.2%), and wage/income gap (18.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 48.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (12.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 224.1%), family poverty (20.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 187.1%), and receiving food stamps (26.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 184.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (29.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 53.2%), single mother poverty (44.5% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 65.7%), and single female poverty (34.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 79.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (12.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 85.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (9.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 84.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 82.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 28.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (58.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (68.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (80.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.4% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 65.4%), births to unmarried women (45.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 64.7%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.28 compared to 3.11, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 58.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 29.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 6.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 92.5%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 84.1%), and master's degree (11.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 77.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 95.5%), self-care disability (3.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 60.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.4%), cognitive disability (19.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 15.5%), and disability age over 75 (52.9% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 17.2%).