Blackfeet vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,626,880 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.370. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to a decrease of 9.5 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,695 compared to $52,649, a difference of 39.7%), median family income ($88,717 compared to $120,301, a difference of 35.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,595 compared to $115,957, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $52,783, a difference of 8.6%), wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 10.4%), and median female earnings ($35,864 compared to $43,941, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 59.0%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 58.2%), and receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 21.2%), and single male poverty (15.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 30.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 41.6%), births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 36.7%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.11, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.23%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 79.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 71.3%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 63.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 38.2%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 8.1%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.7%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 13.1%).