Pueblo vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,239,565 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Pueblo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.559. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pueblo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.088% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pueblo corresponds to an increase of 88.3 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,012 compared to $52,649, a difference of 64.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($68,910 compared to $108,926, a difference of 58.1%), and median family income ($76,880 compared to $120,301, a difference of 56.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,018 compared to $52,783, a difference of 17.2%), householder income over 65 years ($52,930 compared to $67,326, a difference of 27.2%), and wage/income gap (20.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 34.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 185.1%), family poverty (17.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 140.0%), and receiving food stamps (19.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 118.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (21.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 28.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 38.1%), and single mother poverty (37.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 38.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (8.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 74.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (10.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 68.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 68.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.0% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (53.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 93.5%), single father households (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 64.8%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.9%), family households (68.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 40.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.88%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 92.8%), bachelor's degree (25.5% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 80.5%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 67.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 68.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (33.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 55.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.1%).