Argentinean vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,022,667 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.494. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 29.8 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($112,665 compared to $120,301, a difference of 6.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,111 compared to $108,926, a difference of 5.6%), and median male earnings ($60,117 compared to $63,498, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $52,783, a difference of 2.6%), householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $67,326, a difference of 3.2%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 30.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 24.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.63%), single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.6%), births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.73%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 14.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.74%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 34.5%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.9%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.56%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.5%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 0.16%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.27%).