Guatemalan vs Latvian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Latvian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Guatemalans
Latvians
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Latvian Integration in Guatemalan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,196,252 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 0.1 Latvians.
Guatemalan vs Latvian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,766 compared to $52,649, a difference of 39.4%), median family income ($88,295 compared to $120,301, a difference of 36.2%), and median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $63,498, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $52,783, a difference of 2.4%), median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $43,941, a difference of 23.1%), and wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 23.2%).
Income Metric | Guatemalan | Latvian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,766 | Exceptional $52,649 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,295 | Exceptional $120,301 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,961 | Exceptional $97,311 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,205 | Exceptional $53,001 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,736 | Exceptional $63,498 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,695 | Exceptional $43,941 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,525 | Excellent $52,783 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,331 | Exceptional $108,926 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,705 | Exceptional $115,957 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,526 | Exceptional $67,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.6% | Tragic 27.9% |
Guatemalan vs Latvian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 80.5%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 65.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.6%).
Poverty Metric | Guatemalan | Latvian |
Poverty | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.2% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.4% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.8% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.9% | Exceptional 26.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Guatemalan vs Latvian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.1%), female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 28.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Guatemalan | Latvian |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Guatemalan vs Latvian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Guatemalan | Latvian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.5% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.0% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.2% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Guatemalan vs Latvian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.8%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 45.0%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.9%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 9.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Guatemalan | Latvian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.9% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.3% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.40 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.9% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.1% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Guatemalan vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.6%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Guatemalan | Latvian |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Fair 6.1% |
Guatemalan vs Latvian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 124.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 82.5%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 80.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Education Level Metric | Guatemalan | Latvian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Tragic 91.1% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 89.9% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 87.9% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 86.4% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.0% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 78.5% | Exceptional 89.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.8% | Exceptional 71.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.5% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 19.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Guatemalan vs Latvian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 20.3%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.060%), disability (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Disability Metric | Guatemalan | Latvian |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.5% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |