Comanche vs Latvian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Comanche
Latvian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Comanche
Latvians
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Latvian Integration in Comanche Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,982,121 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.909. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.983% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 983.5 Latvians.
Comanche vs Latvian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $52,649, a difference of 38.2%), median family income ($88,556 compared to $120,301, a difference of 35.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $115,957, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $52,783, a difference of 11.1%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $67,326, a difference of 22.6%).
Income Metric | Comanche | Latvian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,088 | Exceptional $52,649 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,556 | Exceptional $120,301 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $73,747 | Exceptional $97,311 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,519 | Exceptional $53,001 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,202 | Exceptional $63,498 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,661 | Exceptional $43,941 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,518 | Excellent $52,783 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,152 | Exceptional $108,926 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $85,787 | Exceptional $115,957 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,922 | Exceptional $67,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 27.9% |
Comanche vs Latvian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 56.1%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 53.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 18.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 21.3%).
Poverty Metric | Comanche | Latvian |
Poverty | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.1% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.0% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.6% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.9% | Exceptional 26.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Comanche vs Latvian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 28.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Comanche | Latvian |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Comanche vs Latvian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 3.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Comanche | Latvian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.0% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.7% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.4% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.2% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Comanche vs Latvian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.0%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 32.4%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.11, a difference of 4.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Comanche | Latvian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.5% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Comanche vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.39%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Comanche | Latvian |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.9% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.5% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Fair 6.1% |
Comanche vs Latvian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 76.7%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 64.1%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 63.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.51%).
Education Level Metric | Comanche | Latvian |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Fair 97.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.8% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.9% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 89.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.4% | Exceptional 71.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.4% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.9% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.9% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 19.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Comanche vs Latvian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 45.0%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 43.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 5.6%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 14.6%).
Disability Metric | Comanche | Latvian |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.3% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.7% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |