Ethiopian vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,129,251 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.266. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 6.4 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 27.6%), per capita income ($46,569 compared to $52,649, a difference of 13.1%), and median male earnings ($56,243 compared to $63,498, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,243 compared to $43,941, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $52,783, a difference of 2.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,989 compared to $67,326, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 30.9%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 24.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (82.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.0%), and married-couple households (43.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.5%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.11, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.8%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.85%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.4%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and master's degree (18.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.92%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 19.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.59%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.8%).