Swiss vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,814,621 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to an increase of 13.5 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,076 compared to $52,649, a difference of 19.5%), median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $43,941, a difference of 15.9%), and median family income ($104,396 compared to $120,301, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $52,783, a difference of 2.5%), wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,621 compared to $67,326, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 13.5%), single female poverty (21.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.4%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.11, a difference of 1.5%), currently married (49.7% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.7%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 39.4%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 34.4%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 24.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.1%).