Liberian vs Latvian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Liberian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Liberians

Latvians

Poor
Exceptional
1,824
SOCIAL INDEX
15.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
286th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Latvian Integration in Liberian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,972,613 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Liberian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.045. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Liberians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Liberians corresponds to an increase of 2.0 Latvians.
Liberian Integration in Latvian Communities

Liberian vs Latvian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Liberian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,780 compared to $52,649, a difference of 35.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,005 compared to $108,926, a difference of 32.8%), and median family income ($91,722 compared to $120,301, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,917 compared to $52,783, a difference of 7.9%), median female earnings ($38,215 compared to $43,941, a difference of 15.0%), and median earnings ($43,536 compared to $53,001, a difference of 21.7%).
Liberian vs Latvian Income
Income MetricLiberianLatvian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,780
Exceptional
$52,649
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,722
Exceptional
$120,301
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,667
Exceptional
$97,311
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,536
Exceptional
$53,001
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,318
Exceptional
$63,498
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,215
Exceptional
$43,941
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,917
Excellent
$52,783
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,005
Exceptional
$108,926
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,929
Exceptional
$115,957
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,356
Exceptional
$67,326
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
27.9%

Liberian vs Latvian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Liberian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 62.3%), family poverty (10.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 49.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.5%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 5.8%).
Liberian vs Latvian Poverty
Poverty MetricLiberianLatvian
Poverty
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.6%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
13.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
13.5%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Tragic
22.4%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Excellent
16.0%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.9%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
9.1%

Liberian vs Latvian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Liberian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 26.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 8.2%).
Liberian vs Latvian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLiberianLatvian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.2%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.9%

Liberian vs Latvian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Liberian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
Liberian vs Latvian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLiberianLatvian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.8%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.9%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.8%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.0%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.4%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.7%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Excellent
83.0%
Exceptional
83.8%

Liberian vs Latvian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Liberian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 63.5%), births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 34.8%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.0% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.11, a difference of 4.6%), and family households with children (28.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.9%).
Liberian vs Latvian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLiberianLatvian
Family Households
Tragic
62.0%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.3%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.7%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.2%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.4%
Exceptional
27.7%

Liberian vs Latvian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Liberian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.4%).
Liberian vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLiberianLatvian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.0%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.0%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.7%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.0%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.3%
Fair
6.1%

Liberian vs Latvian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Liberian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 75.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 69.5%), and master's degree (12.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.89%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.90%).
Liberian vs Latvian Education Level
Education Level MetricLiberianLatvian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Fair
94.8%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.8%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.7%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
85.0%
Exceptional
89.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.0%
Exceptional
71.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
66.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.3%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
46.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
19.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.6%

Liberian vs Latvian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Liberian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 27.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 20.7%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and male disability (11.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.9%).
Liberian vs Latvian Disability
Disability MetricLiberianLatvian
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.6%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%