Immigrants from Kenya vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,840,677 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant from Kenya communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kenya within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kenya corresponds to an increase of 41.5 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,661 compared to $52,649, a difference of 23.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,767 compared to $108,926, a difference of 20.0%), and median family income ($100,679 compared to $120,301, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,633 compared to $52,783, a difference of 6.4%), median female earnings ($39,535 compared to $43,941, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,710 compared to $67,326, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (9.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 30.0%), receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 29.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.6%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.9%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 32.0%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.5%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.3% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.67%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.11, a difference of 3.3%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.080%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 42.6%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.2%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.86%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.1%).